The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear Stephen Thaler’s appeal over copyright protection for artwork generated by his AI system, DABUS. Lower courts had upheld the U.S. Copyright Office’s rejection, stating copyright requires a human author – and AI-created art is ineligible for copyright protection.

Reuters reports that by refusing the case, the Court leaves that standard untouched. Fully autonomous AI works remain ineligible and America’s highest judicial court won’t reconsider that decision.
“It’s rare for the Supreme Court to do anything for society’s benefit these days,” notes Matt Schimkowitz over at Paste Magazine, “…But, for once, by refusing to do anything, they’ve struck a win for artists.”
The Verge notes Thaler had asked the Supreme Court to review earlier rulings in October 2025, arguing it “created a chilling effect on anyone else considering using AI creatively.”
“This is a structural checkpoint for generative AI,” the team at AI Secrets, a website covering AI development, observes. “Billions are flowing into systems that can produce images, music, code, and marketing assets at industrial scale.
“Yet if no human authorship is demonstrated, those outputs are legally ownerless. That undercuts exclusivity, weakens defensibility, and complicates IP valuations across media, software, and design markets.”
Last year, the U.S. Copyright Office issued new guidance that says AI-generated artwork based on text prompts isn’t protected by copyright.
Categories: downthetubes News
Five Comics That Would Fit in a Modern “Action”
Mr Jones Watches teams up with Beano to celebrate 75 years of Dennis the Menace
ARC, a new, free Comics Festival comes to London in July