The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear Stephen Thaler’s appeal over copyright protection for artwork generated by his AI system, DABUS. Lower courts had upheld the U.S. Copyright Office’s rejection, stating copyright requires a human author – and AI-created art is ineligible for copyright protection.

Reuters reports that by refusing the case, the Court leaves that standard untouched. Fully autonomous AI works remain ineligible and America’s highest judicial court won’t reconsider that decision.
“It’s rare for the Supreme Court to do anything for society’s benefit these days,” notes Matt Schimkowitz over at Paste Magazine, “…But, for once, by refusing to do anything, they’ve struck a win for artists.”
The Verge notes Thaler had asked the Supreme Court to review earlier rulings in October 2025, arguing it “created a chilling effect on anyone else considering using AI creatively.”
“This is a structural checkpoint for generative AI,” the team at AI Secrets, a website covering AI development, observes. “Billions are flowing into systems that can produce images, music, code, and marketing assets at industrial scale.
“Yet if no human authorship is demonstrated, those outputs are legally ownerless. That undercuts exclusivity, weakens defensibility, and complicates IP valuations across media, software, and design markets.”
Last year, the U.S. Copyright Office issued new guidance that says AI-generated artwork based on text prompts isn’t protected by copyright.
Categories: downthetubes News
In Review: All You Need is Kill (2025)
Crowdfunding Spotlight: To Boldly Figure, a superb looking Star Trek figures book
Dungeons & Dragons set to storm The O2, London, this August
Five Places To Start Listening to Doctor Who Audio Adventures
Leave a Reply